Teaching Comparative Government and Politics

Friday, October 20, 2006

Controlling Civil Society in Russia

The New York Times reported on Friday the latest developments in what seems to be attempts by the Russian government to control civil society.

Kremlin Puts Foreign NGO’s on Notice

"Scores of foreign private organizations were forced to cease their operations in Russia on Thursday while the government considered whether to register them under a new law that has received sharp international criticism...


"The Justice Ministry, which is responsible for registering foreign private organizations, insisted that the suspensions were neither retaliatory nor permanent...

"But the suspensions were the latest chapter in Russia’s pressure on foreign organizations that have offices on its soil. They occurred in a climate of deepening worry about the Kremlin’s crackdown on civil society and just days before a planned visit by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice...

"Some Russian officials, including Nikolai P. Patrushev, the chief of the domestic intelligence service, have accused the groups of interfering with state affairs or even harboring spies.

"The new law, strongly backed by President Vladimir V. Putin, created extensive new filing requirements, which in some cases the organizations said had been so tedious and lengthy as to be almost impossible to fulfill. The groups have also expressed apprehension over the rules’ vagueness, which could allow any group to be audited, and perhaps closed, on a pretext..."

The Washington Post coverage emphasized the restrictions on American NGOs.

Russia Halts Activities of Many Groups From Abroad

"Russia on Thursday suspended the activities of Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the International Republican Institute and more than 90 other foreign nongovernmental organizations, saying they failed to meet the registration requirements of a controversial new law designed to bring activists here under much closer government scrutiny...

"On Thursday, officials said the suspensions resulted simply from the failure of private groups to meet the law's requirements, not from a political decision on the part of the state. The groups would be allowed to resume work once their registrations are completed, they said...


"Many nongovernmental organizations fear that the current bureaucratic tangle might be the beginning of a larger crackdown on activism that is not controlled by the Kremlin...

"Many of the suspended organizations are American...

"Activists complained, however, that the requirements of the law are so vague and cumbersome that meeting the deadline was extremely difficult...

"Other groups, however, said they found the registration office helpful..."


Related posts:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home